Friday, June 1, 2007

The McKinsey Quarterly: 'Transforming US Hospitals'

By: Kurt D. Grote, Paul D. Mango, and Saumya S. Sutaria
Reviewed By: Abhas Gupta
    This short article outlines preƫmptive steps that hospitals can take to stave off competition and increase profits in the next decade. Before diving into the article, let's quickly outline the two basic approaches for revenue growth:

    Increase margins
    • Decrease operational costs (salaries, day-to-day expenses, etc.)
    • Decrease supplier costs (medical devices, medical equipment, administered drugs, etc.)
    • Lower malpractice insurance (improved service quality leads to decreased premiums)
    • Increase reimbursement (the federal government is increasing reimbursements of top-performers thanks to an August '06 Executive Order)

    Increase volume
    • Capture larger market share (get more patients)
    • Improve turnover rates in abundant service areas (many cardiologists have month-long waiting times for appointments; improving their turnover rates directly increases profits)
    • Market directly to patients in consumer-driven services

    One important caveat to hospitals increasing margins is that insurance companies would be inclined to reimburse less, so hospitals may actually have little incentive to improve on this front. Also, approaches to increase patient volume only apply to areas where competition for patients exists (urban hospitals, primarily). 'Transforming US Hospitals' identifies several best practices of hospitals around the country and predicts the changing landscape of the health care industry. The primary recommendations to hospitals include:
    • Reorient operations along clinical-service lines -- these are essentially "focused factories" (see previous post), but are more applicable to a hospital setting. By dividing a hospital up into its clinical-service lines (diagnostic imaging, cardiology, orthopedics), management can more easily isolate low performers, adopt best practices within these divisions, and hold people accountable for poor performance

    • Restructure relationships with physicians - physicians need incentive to modify their behavior for not just efficiency, but also costs (i.e. selecting cheaper devices, prescribing generic drugs, etc.). One important suggestion: give physicians lower than average base pay with performance pay "linked to metrics on quality, service, and cost"

    • Commit to superior service and quality -- with increasing information about service and quality available to insurance companies and patients, hospitals will need to excel in order to attract more customers. Moreover, better quality service should result in lower malpractice insurance premiums

    • Improve collection means - more and more medical services are being paid out-of-pocket each year; however, only 50-60% of patient charges are collected (compare this with 95% for the credit card industry). Hospitals need to either "learn from retailers about how to manage revenue cycles and improve collections" or partner with financial firms
    As I mentioned in the first post, everyone in healthcare is looking for ways to cut costs. Physicians need to realize that performance-based pay is likely to become the standard compensation structure in the next decade. Therefore, it is imperative that physicians attain a basic knowledge of economic and management principles so they're not caught off guard. I will soon publish a series of posts entitled "Consulting Frameworks 101", so stay tuned.

    This article can be accessed at McKinsey Health Care. Registration and subscription may be required.

    1 comment:

    p said...

    Hi blogger,

    I think your analyses and critiques of the McKinsey article and the below book are well thought out. But as these are ideas, and not fertile chics, there is no need to withdraw so prematurely.

    Speaking generally, when thinkers devise economic arguments from 'first principles,' they (we?) often embrace the concept of the rational consumer. This fictional 'consumer' character is nowhere more hardpressed to actualize than in medicine. Because of the informational and educational gap between physicians and their 'customers' there is not yet a practical way of making the consumer of healthcare as informed or rational as society would deem acceptable. I think that this is the main limitation in 'marketizing' healthcare. I agree that the reimbursement process is quite unique to medicine, but it has evolved out of a necessity to shield patients from a responsibility that they are not capable of, or atleast not prepared to assume.

    I remember once particular small-group session in medical school, with a visiting teaching assistant in medical ethics (who was really hot, just by the way), where we directly addressed this issue. I argued as you did, and she provided me with a little insight. Perhaps i didn't force the issue (or my seed) sufficiently onto her.